Strategy and Fragility

The architecture of risk and reward.

In 2015, Beijing published a document called Made in China 2025. It named ten industries: advanced manufacturing, aerospace, biotech, new-energy vehicles, AI hardware, robotics, and several others. It set targets, timelines, and financing. It coordinated ministries, state-owned enterprises, banks, universities, and provincial governments around a single intent: move Chinese industry up the value chain, from things that are simple and cheap to things that are complex and expensive.

In 2025, Washington produced no comparable document. Not because anyone forgot, and not because there was nothing to plan for. Because no institution exists in the United States authorized to write one, and no institution could guarantee it would survive the next election.

This is not a story about which country is winning. It is a story about political fragility: what happens when a strategy requires sustained commitment across decades, but your system is built on contested elections.

Post 6 of a 10-part series on globalization, concentration, and strategic de-risking.

Keep reading on my Substack

***